Can science accept the
bible?
It is true that
in the past science and church has been in conflict, and today it is
thought that modern scientific study can or will be able to explain
everything, and that the results of scientific research are in
conflict with biblical teaching.
Prominent
scholars have commented on the above question.
"Men became
scientific because they expected Law in Nature, and they expected
Law in Nature because they believed in a Legislator". C.S.Lewis
Miracles
Dr. Peter
Hodgson, lecturer in nuclear physics in Oxford University, said
"Christianity provided just those beliefs that are essential for
science, and the whole moral climate that encouraged its
growth". John Young The Case against
Christ
The historian
Herbert Butterfield stated that "science is a child of Christian
thought" and the philospher John MacMurray put it like this "Science
is the legitimate child of a great religious movement, and its
geneology goes back to Jesus." John MacMurray Reason and
Emotion
Much of history
Christianity and scientific study have been allies.
Copurnicus laid
the foundations of modern astronomy and held office as a Canon of
Frauenberg Cathedral. He described God as "the best and most orderly
workman of all"
Galileo said
"There are two big books, the book of nature and the book of
supernature, the Bible"
Kepler the
founder of modern optics, best know for his discovery of the three
principles of planetary motion, a sincere Christian, commented that
he was "thinking God's thoughts after Him".
Sir Isaac
Newton, considered by many to be one of the greatest scientists of
all time believed in the inspiration of the scriptures and wrote
theological books as well as scientific works.
Faraday
discovered the phenomenen of electromagnetic induction and he
considered his Christian faith the most important influence upon
him.
The same is
true for many other pioneering scientists. Lister who pioneered
antispetic surgery; Pasteur originated pasteurization; Mendel helped
form the basis of the science of genetics; Kelvin the founding of
modern physics;Maxwell formulated electromagnetic theory.
One of the
leading scientists of our day is Reverend Dr. John Polkinghorne,
president of Queens' College, Cambridge, Fellow of the Royal
Society, who was professor of mathmatical physics before his
ordination in 1983, wrote:
Men of religion
can learn from science what the physical world is really like in its
structure and long-evolving history. This constrains what religion
can say where it speaks of that world as God's creation. He is
clearly a patient God who works through process and not by magic.
Men of science can receive from religion a deeper understanding than
could be obtained from science alone. The physical world's deep
mathematical intelligibility (sings of the Mind behind it) and
finely tuned fruitfulness (expressive of divine purpose) are
reflections of the fact that it is a creation. John Polkinghorne
The
Daily Telegraph
Even Stephen
Hawking, considered the most brilliant scientist of this generation,
has admitted that "science may solve the problem of how the universe
began, but it cannot answer the question: Why does the universe
bother to exist?" Stephen Hawking Black Holes and Baby
Universes and Other Essays
One of the
biggest arguments is creation versus evolution. It is easier to
believe that God created something out of nothing than to believe
that nothing created something out of nothing. Towards the end of
his life Charles Darwin wrote of "the impossibility of conceiving
this immense and wonderful universe, including man, as a result of
blind chance or necessity. When thus reflecting, I feel compelled to
look to the first cause having an intelligent mind in some degree
analogous to that of man and I deserve to be called a
theist".
Albert Einstein
wrote "A legitimate conflict between science and religion cannot
exist. Science without religion is lame, religion without science is
blind."
We cannot find
the God of the bible through science alone and God is not
discoverable by purely scientific means. We need revelation from God
and it is only through His special revelation of His Son Jesus
Christ that we can find Him.
"Scientists, or
anyone else, without religion, have to face a world in which there
is no real purpose, no meaning to torment and joy, and accept that
when we are dead we vanish, that there is no after-life" Wolpert
The
Times
Science has
nothing to say to these deep levels of human experience. Science is
unable to solve the moral dilemmas of humankind. It has no remedy
for the problem of unforgiven sin and guilt. Only in the Cross of
Christ do we find the answer to these problems and salvation for our souls.
|